On any ringed space we know what it means for an $\mathcal_ X$-module to be (finite) locally free. On an affine scheme this matches the notion defined in the algebra chapter.
Lemma 28.20.1 . Let $X = \mathop<\mathrm
Proof. Follows from the definitions, see Modules, Definition 17.14.1 and Algebra, Definition 10.78.1. $\square$
We can characterize finite locally free modules in many different ways.
Lemma 28.20.2 . Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal_ X$-module. The following are equivalent:
Proof. This lemma immediately reduces to the affine case. In this case the lemma is a reformulation of Algebra, Lemma 10.78.2. The translation uses Lemmas 28.16.1, 28.16.2, 28.19.1, and 28.20.1. $\square$
Lemma 28.20.3 . Let $X$ be a reduced scheme. Let $\mathcal$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal_ X$-module. Then the equivalent conditions of Lemma 28.20.2 are also equivalent to
Proof. This lemma immediately reduces to the affine case. In this case the lemma is a reformulation of Algebra, Lemma 10.78.3. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$ ). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.